Skip to main content

School of Politics & International Relations

  • Home
  • People
    • Head of School/Centres
    • Academics
    • Visitors and honorary appointees
    • Current HDR students
    • Graduated HDR students
    • Associates
  • Events
    • Event series
    • Conferences
      • Past conferences
    • Past events
  • News
  • Study with us
    • Undergraduate programs
    • Honours program
    • Higher Degree by Research
    • SPIR summer/winter courses
  • Research
    • Publications
    • Research projects
      • Electoral Surveys
        • ANUpoll
        • Australian Election Study
        • World Values Survey
      • Gender Research
        • A history of the Women’s Electoral Lobby
        • Gender-Focused Parliamentary Institutions Research Network
        • Gender and Feminism in the Social Sciences
        • Mapping the Australian Women's Movement
          • Project Structure
          • Project Team
          • Publications
          • AWM Events
          • Institutional Legacy
          • Online Communities
          • AWM Evolution
          • Contact
      • Atrocity Forecasting Project
        • The Forecasts
        • Personnel
        • Publications
      • Human Rights
        • UN Human Rights Agreements
          • Access the data
      • Interpretation, Method and Critique
      • POLPOP
      • COMPAS 2025
  • Contact us

Centres

  • Australian Centre for Federalism
  • The Australian Politics Studies Centre

Related Sites

  • ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences
  • Research School of Humanities and the Arts
  • Research School of Social Sciences
  • Australian National Internships Program

Australian Centre for Federalism

Australian Politics Studies Centre

School of Politics & International Relations

Related sites

Related sites

Breadcrumb

HomeResearchResearch ProjectsHow Politicians Evaluate Public Opinion (POLPOP)POLPOP Key Findings of The Australian First Wave
POLPOP Key Findings of the Australian First Wave
Parliament house Canberra Australia at Sunset By Bruce Aspley

Parliament house Canberra Australia at Sunset By Bruce Aspley (AdobeStock)

This research forms part of a multi-country study examining how politicians understand and use public opinion in their work. Our Australian_study provides unique insights into political representation and decision-making in the Australian context.

How do politicians differ from citizens?

The study reveals differences between politicians and citizens in their backgrounds and worldviews. Politicians typically have higher educational attainment and have experienced greater social mobility compared to the general Australian population. They also show stronger confidence in scientific evidence and expert opinion and tend to hold their beliefs with greater certainty than citizens.

How do politicians view voter behaviour?

description

Figure 1: Parliamentarians’ perceptions of voter fairness, per cent of responses.


Politicians believe voters are generally well-informed about political issues, though they perceive voters as focusing on a limited range of concerns and adopting shorter-term perspectives. Notably, politicians think voters place more emphasis on party leaders' personalities and performance than on policy positions and ideas. There is considerable disagreement among politicians about whether voters prioritise group and partisan identities over policy preferences when evaluating political performance. As illustrated in the figure above, Australian politicians are split on whether voters are fair judges of their performance.

How do politicians approach decision-making?

descriptionFigure 2: The criteria politicians use to evaluate public opinion, ranked. A ranking of one indicates the politician finds the criterion most relevant and five, the least.


Australian politicians demonstrate a strong preference for evidence-based decision-making, placing significant weight on information and data when forming policy positions. This aligns with their higher confidence in scientific expertise compared to the general population.

 

How do politicians allocate their time?

descriptionFigure 3: Activities in a parliamentarian’s ideal day (average)

 

The study reveals interesting patterns in how politicians would ideally distribute their working hours. They prefer to dedicate only a small portion (6%) of their time to party-related activities. Instead, they seek to balance their time equally between three main areas: legislative work, consultation with interest groups and experts, and media engagement. These three activities collectively represent the majority of politicians' preferred time allocation, reflecting a focus on policy development, stakeholder engagement, and public communication.

 

Home / Research Reports / Investigators / Partners 
 

Documents

AttachmentSize
How-Politicians-Evaluate-Public-Opinion-First-Findings-Report-Australia.pdf(8.05 MB)8.05 MB

Image Gallery